Thursday, October 30, 2014

PeopleSoft's paths to the Cloud - Part II

In my previous post, I've covered some ways in which cloud computing features could be used with PeopleSoft, particularly around Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) and non-Production environments. Now, I'm going to discuss how cloud technologies bring value to PeopleSoft Production environments.

Gain Flexibility

Some of the advantages of hosting PeopleSoft Production environments using an IaaS provider were also mentioned in the my past article as they are also valid for Non Production environments:

  • Ability to adjust processing power (CPU) and memory according to peak usage.
  • Storage may be enlarged at any time to cope with increasing requirements.
  • Possibility of replicating the existing servers for contingency purposes.

In terms of cost, hosting the Production environment in IaaS may not always be cheaper than the on premise alternative (this needs to be analyzed on a case by case basis). However, the possibility to add more CPU, memory and storage on the run gives IaaS solutions an unprecedented flexibility. It is true that you can obtain similar flexibility with in house virtualized environments, but not many in-house data centers have the available horsepower of Amazon, IBM or Oracle data centers, to name a few.

Be Elastic

Adding additional power to the existing servers may not be the best way to scale up. An alternative way is to add a new server to the PeopleSoft architecture. This type of architecture is called elastic (actually, Amazon EC2 stands for Elastic Computing), as the architecture can elastically grow or shrink in order to adapt to the user load.

Many PeopleSoft customers use Production environments with multiple servers for high availability purposes. You may have two web servers, two application servers, two process schedulers, and so on. This architecture guarantees a better system availability in case one of the nodes fails. Using an elastic architecture means that we can add, for instance, a third application server not only to increase redundancy, but also the application performance.

In order to implement an elastic architecture, you need to fulfill two requirements:

  1. You should be able to quickly deploy an additional instance of any part of the architecture. 
  2. Once the instance is created, it should be plugged in the rest of the components, without disrupting the system availability.

The first point is easily covered by creating an Amazon AMI which can be instantiated at any moment. I've discussed the basics about AMIs in my previous post, but there is plenty of information from Amazon.

The second point is a bit trickier. Let's assume we are adding a new application server instance. If you do not declare this application server in the web servers file, it will not be used.

Of course you can do this manually, but my suggestion is that you try to automate these tasks, as it is this automation which will eventually bring elasticity to your architecture. You need to plan the automation not only for enlarging the architecture, but also for potential reduction (in case you covered a usage peak by increasing the instances and then you want to go back to the original situation).

At BNB we have built a generic elastic architecture, covering all layers of a normal PeopleSoft architecture. If you are planning to move to a cloud infrastructure and you need assistance, we would be happy to help.

Coming Next...

In my next post on this topic, I will cover how Database as a Service could be used to host PeopleSoft databases and what value it brings to PeopleSoft customers.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

PeopleSoft's paths to the Cloud - Part I

Nowadays, all paths seem to lead to cloud computing. In the business applications world, Oracle is pushing hard to position the Oracle Cloud Applications in an increasingly competitive market. The reasons that favor Software as a Service (SaaS) applications over their on premise counterparties are significant, even though there are still a good number of circumstances under which the latter should normally be the preferred option.

Our beloved PeopleSoft (yes, I like PeopleSoft, so what?) is clearly not a SaaS application. Still, my point of view is that we can still benefit of many cloud computing features without migrating to another application.

On this post, and a few more to come, I will focus on the aspects of cloud computing could be incorporated to your PeopleSoft application.

Infrastructure as a Service

Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) is a provision model in which an organization outsources the equipment used to support operations, including storage, hardware, servers and networking components. The service provider owns the equipment and is responsible for housing, running and maintaining it. The client typically pays on a per-use basis.

Probably the best known service in this category is Amazon EC2, but there are many other providers with similar features. We have installed PeopleSoft quite a few times under Amazon EC2, and the advantages are visible immediately:

  • CPU, memory and disk space can be dynamically allocated. This is particularly useful when facing system usage peaks, for instance close to the evaluations submission deadline when using the PeopleSoft ePerformance module.
  • Servers can be seamlessly cloned, which enormously reduces the time needed to set up new environments.
  • The instance cloning can also take place between different geographical areas, providing a perfect solution for contingency environments.
  • As mentioned before, the allocated servers are paid on a per-use basis. The only exception is storage, for which you will get charged even if the server is down (and assuming you still keep the storage space busy for the next time the instance is booted).

Use Case: Development Environments

One of the most typical uses of IaaS with PeopleSoft is for non-production environments. In many cases, these environments do not need to be up and running 24x7, so the solution provided by Infrastructure as a Service is not only more flexible, but also normally more cost effective.

The flexibility of IaaS is major advantage when a sandbox environment is needed. Cloning any existing environment just takes a few minutes allowing the developers to build prototypes on a new and isolated environment that is out of the migration path.

Use Case: Test a New Release

Another functionality of IaaS is the ability to use templates that could be rapidly be used to create a new instance based on it. The Amazon name for these templates is AMI. In the past, Oracle used to provide AMIs for PeopleSoft 9.1, so if you wanted to test that release, it was just a couple of minutes away.

However, currently there are no AMIs provided by Oracle for PeopleSoft 9.2. Luckily, you may still contact consulting companies like BNB to provide you the AMI, as long as you have a valid PeopleSoft license (the Oracle provided AMIs are under a trial license, so even if you are not currently a PeopleSoft customer you can use them).

Note: An alternative way to test a new release is to download the latest PeopleSoft Update Manager image, but it takes considerable time to do it due to the size of the files (over 30 Gb).

Use Case: Training

IaaS can also be used to quickly deploy PeopleSoft instances for internal user training. We actually use this approach at BNB for training our consultants. We have created an AMI for each course, so before the training session starts, we create one instance per student, so they have a completely isolated environment to learn and play with.

Coming Next...

In the next post, I will cover the value that cloud computing brings to PeopleSoft Production environments. But that's not the end of it, so stay tuned.

Monday, October 27, 2014

PeopleTools 8.54 Feature: Application Engine Trace File Enhancements

In this blog, we have been reviewing the new features of PeopleTools 8.54. Today is the turn of Application Engine, particularly on its troubleshooting. This release of PeopleTools include several enhancements on Application Engine tracing, which are outlined below:

  • The .AET trace file can now include the PeopleCode trace. This removes the need of checking the .AET file for the the non-PeopleCode steps and the .TRC file for the PeopleCode steps. Surely, .TRC files could also contain the SQL executed in non-PeopleCode steps if needed, but it was significantly more difficult to read as the SQL statements were not formatted.

This new feature is enabled by setting the TraceAECombineOutput parameter in the server configuration file for Application Server or Process Scheduler Server.


  • You can set the file size of the Application Engine Trace file. This way, if the trace file exceeds the threshold, it splits into a different file. For certain processes, this could be quite handy, as sometimes the trace sizes become unmanageable.

This new feature is enabled by setting the AETFileSize parameter in the server configuration file for Application Server or Process Scheduler Server. The size is measured in Megabytes.


  • You can actually select which sections of an Application Engine program should be traced and which not. This can contribute to reduce unneeded trace information, just focusing on the potential error areas.

This new feature is enabled by setting the TraceAEEnableSection parameter in the server configuration file for Application Server or Process Scheduler Server.


Then, using Application Designed, you should mark the sections you want to trace. Keep in mind that by default all sections are unmarked:

In order to enable the flag in Application Designer, the Enable Section Trace(g) setting has to be enabled in Configuration Manager:

Note: As far as I can tell, you can only set this flag when you create a new section. If you need to modify an existing one, you would need to copy and paste, and then remove the original one. Have any of you found a more efficient way of setting the flag?

  • The Application Engine Trace file name now includes the Date/Time stamp.

These enhancements should simplify troubleshooting of Application Engine program issues, particularly those ones containing a significant amount of PeopleCode processing or generating very large trace files.

Friday, October 24, 2014

PeopleTools 8.54 Feature: ExcelToCI Errors and Warnings Worksheet

Some years ago, I wrote this post on ExcelToCI limitations. One of the limitations I've found annoying in the past was the need to move the mouse over each Warning or Error result cell. It was not just annoying, it actually didn't allow the users to easily work on the different error types and analyze useful information such as the most common error messages, how many rows would go through if they solved a particular issue, etc.

PeopleTools 8.54 has introduced a new worksheet showing all the warning and error messages. The following screenshot provides a clear view on how the information is presented:

From that point on, the users may analyze the messages using Excel dynamic tables, filters, etc. Yet, there is some room for improvement. The most obvious one is to put each particular error in a different Excel row. That would make error analysis much richer.

Let's see how this evolves with the next releases of PeopleTools.

Thursday, October 23, 2014

PeopleSoft's PS_HOME evolution

One of the new features of PeopleTools 8.54 is the portability of the PS_HOME directory. Before going into the analysis of its benefits, let's have a look back to how  PS_HOME has evolved.

One Directory for Everything

PS_HOME is the name of the environment variable holding the PeopleSoft installation directory. Before PeopleTools 8.50, the full PeopleSoft installation was done on a single directory, including PeopleTools binaries, application external files, customized files, logs, etc. Also, in those installations using WebLogic and WebSphere, the J2EE deployment was normally located at PS_HOME/webserv (this was not the case for Oracle Application Server, which its their own directories for that purpose).

The main issue with this approach is that the Ops team would normally go nuts when they saw how the directories were structured in PeopleSoft. Very often, keeping read-only binary files and always changing log files on the same directory structure would not comply with the internal policies in many organizations. With some degree of manual configuration and symbolic linking, this issue could be tackled, but the solution increased the maintenance costs, particularly when a PeopleTools or application upgrade came into the scene.

Splitting Logic and Data

PeopleTools 8.50 provided the ability to split the PS_HOME directory contents into three different places:
  • PIA_HOME: contained the J2EE deployment, equivalent to the former PS_HOME/webserv directory.
  • PS_CFG_HOME: contained logs, traces and search indexes. Basically, any file created, modified or deleted at run time.
  • PS_HOME: contained the binaries and external programs such as Crystal Reports. Cobols and SQRs.
This was a major improvement. Now the binaries could be kept as read-only except when an external program was migrated. Moreover, the monitoring of disk space could now be restricted to PIA_HOME and PS_CFG_HOME.

PeopleTools and Applications in Different Rooms

PeopleTools 8.52, together with the PeopleSoft 9.1 applications, introduced a new directory: PS_APP_HOME. This directory contained exclusively the application binaries and external program files, leaving PS_HOME just for the specific PeopleTools files.

This approach allowed a simpler maintenance of the product. For instance, you could use the same PS_HOME for both PeopleSoft HCM and FSCM, keeping the specific application files in their own PS_APP_HOME directories. This way, when you applied a PeopleTools patch on PS_HOME, it would be available for all applications.

Clearly Identify your Customizations

The natural evolution of PS_APP_HOME was PS_CUST_HOME, which was introduced by PeopleTools 8.53. This new directory was meant to hold all the customized external files. This helped not only in maintaining PS_HOME and PS_APP_HOME almost readonly (they would be updated only by PeopleTools or application upgrades), but also to clearly identify the customizations, which is a tremendous gain when performing an application upgrade.

And now... Portable PS_HOME

PeopleTools 8.54 has gone a step further in simplifying the maintenance of the PeopleSoft installation. One of the issues we still faced with PS_HOME is that we could not move it to a different directory without facing issues, as there were some symbolic links and files containing absolute directory references within it.

This could be solved by adjusting the symbolic links and directory references, but it was a time consuming process. The alternative was to reinstall PS_HOME from the delivered install images, but in the best scenario, this could take a couple of hours.

In the latest PeopleTools release, all symbolic links were removed, and all the directory references are relative, not absolute. This allows the system administrator to easily move the directory to another location, or even to another server. Actually, you may not even need to move it. Just mounting the PS_HOME directory installed in one server into all the different PeopleSoft servers would make the trick, so you only need to apply changes in a single place.

I'm sure System Administrators and Installers will love this new feature. At BNB we are also analyzing other potential uses for it, but let me keep the secret for the moment ;).

Tip: One of the symbolic links removed in UNIX/Linux platforms was the PS_HOME/appserv/psadmin link. If you have any maintenance script to boot or shutdown services using this path, you will need to adjust it to the source location: PS_HOME/bin/psadmin, or just call psadmin after executing

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

PeopleTools 8.54 Features: Dynamic Alert Sliding Windows

One of my first memories in the PeopleSoft world was from by training bootcamp when I joined PeopleSoft. The instructor was showing us the Process Monitor functionality in PeopleSoft 7.5, where the button used to refresh the list of scheduled processes was represented by fetching dog named Sparky shown to the right of this paragraph.

It actually surprised me that an application button had a name, but that was the PeopleSoft style. Anyway, the poor dog did not last too much. In year 2000, with the introduction of PeopleSoft 8, our beloved Sparky was replaced by a boring Refresh button.

PeopleTools 8.54 has pushed this functionality to the next generation, making it potentially redundant. One of the new features in this release is the ability to show the status of the process within the same page were it is scheduled. This is a major usability improvement, as the users do not need to navigate to Process Monitor to check the status of the process instance. True, in previous PeopleTools versions there was also the possibility of running the process with output to Window, which using REN Server would achieve a similar result. The main drawback of REN Server is that it opened a new page/tab even before the process was finished, making the navigation more complicated.

The new functionality is called Dynamic Alert Sliding Windows, which is still more boring than Sparky, but what matters is the functionality, not the name. These notifications are enabled in the Process Scheduler System Settings page:

In this page, the administrator chooses which Status are going to be displayed to the user when running a process. As you see, the functionality is quite easy to setup and a significant step forward in usability of batch process scheduling.

Note (Feb 6th 2015): There is a great blog post by Srinivas Reddy demonstrating this functionality from an user perspective. Here is the link:

Thursday, October 16, 2014

My global view on Oracle OpenWorld 2014

For those who can read Spanish, I just posted in our company blog an entry describing a general overview of Oracle OpenWorld announcements. A couple of weeks ago I made a post on this blog describing the most important outcomes from a PeopleSoft point of view. This new post gives a broader view. 

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

New Integration Network Utilities in PeopleTools 8.54

The new integration features available in PeopleTools 8.54 include better support for REST services and the new Integration Network WorkCenter. There are plenty of things to test and eventually use that may be of interest of anyone upgrading to this PeopleTools release. However, today I will focus on two simple but quite handy utilities:

Saving Gateway Metadata

There is a new functionality that saves the configuration file in the database for future use or deployment on other gateway instances.

It has happened to me a couple of times that I did redeploy of PIA that reset the configuration file to the default version. Ok, it wasn't very clever of me, as I could easily take a backup of the file before doing the redeploy, but this save to database button seems easier to use than navigating through the endless PIA directory structure.

Node Lockdown

Another handy feature that allows us to block certain attributes of Nodes, so they are not overwritten when performing an Application Designer project copy.

The page used to lock the attributes is the following:

You just need to pick which attributes should be locked and for which nodes.

Both seem nice and useful utilities delivered by PeopleTools 8.54. I hope you also find them of interest.

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

The new %SelectDummyTable MetaSQL

Does anyone know a PeopleSoft developer who didn't ever use a SQL statement like the following one?

select %CurrentDateOut

Where PS_INSTALLATION could be any single-row table in the PeopleSoft data model.

If you look at the previous statement, the SELECT clause is not retrieving any field from the PS_INSTALLATION table, but just using it to comply with ANSI SQL. The same statement could be written in Microsoft SQL Server like this:

select %CurrentDateOut;

In Oracle Database, as:

select %CurrentDateOut
from dual;

In both cases, the sentences are a better performing option. Both solutions do not require accessing any physical table.

The problem with these solutions is that they are platform specific, and we want to avoid platform specific syntax. Believe me, when you perform a platform migration you suddenly have very present in your mind the ancestors of the programmers who used this type of syntax. So, up to now, we had to stick with the SELECT ... FROM PS_INSTALLATION solution.

Until now. PeopleTools 8.54 introduces a new MetaSQL name %SelectDummyTable, which automatically translates into a platform specific sentences. Our previous sample would be written as:

select %CurrentDateOut
from %SelectDummyTable

We now have a platform independent and well performing solution. What else can we ask for? ;-)

Note: I've checked the online PeopleBooks from Oracle and at this point there is no documentation on this Meta SQL. Still, I've conducted some tests and it seems to be working correctly.

Monday, October 13, 2014

PeopleTools 8.54 will be the last release to certify Crystal Reports

It was just a question of time. In July 2011, Oracle announced that newly acquired PeopleSoft applications would not include a Crystal Reports license. Some years before, in October 2007, Business Objects was acquired by SAP. You don't need to read Machiavelli's Il Principe to understand why the license was now not included.

In order to keep customer's investment on custom reports safe, Oracle kept updating Crystal Reports certifications for those customers who purchased PeopleSoft applications before that date. In parallel, BI Publisher was improved release after release, providing a viable replacement to Crystal Reports, and in many areas surpassing its features.

Now, as announced in My Oracle Support's document 1927865.1, PeopleTools 8.54 will be the last release for which Crystal Reports will be certified, and support for report issues will end together with the expiration of PeopleSoft 9.1 applications support.

PeopleTools 8.54 was just released a couple of months ago, so there is no need to panic, but PeopleSoft applications managers would do well if they start coming up with an strategy to convert their existing Crystal Reports into BI Publisher reports.

Friday, October 10, 2014

Using Global Temporary Tables in Application Engine

One of the new PeopleTools 8.54 features that went probably a bit unnoticed amidst the excitement on the new Fluid interface is the ability of Application Engine programs to take advantage of Global Temporary Tables (GTTs) when using an Oracle Database.

What are GTTs?

The Global Temporary Tables were introduced by Oracle already on the 8i version of its database product. These tables are session specific, meaning that the data inserted in them only lasts until the session is closed (in Oracle Database there is the possibility of using them only until the next commit, but that option is not used by PeopleSoft). The data inserted in the table by each session is not seen by other sessions. In other words, it is a very similar behavior to Application Engine Temporary Tables. The benefit of using a database supported solution rather the traditional temporary tables is better performance, since GTTs are optimized for temporary data.

How is it implemented in PeopleTools?

The implementation in PeopleTools is quite simple. When selecting Temporary Table as the record type, a new option is enabled: "Global Temporary Table (GTT)".

The build SQL generated by PeopleTools is slightly different to traditional tables:


Note: The SQL Build process still creates as many instances of the table as it did with traditional temporary tables. This sounds like a bug to me, as my guess is that the whole idea of using GTTs is to be able to share a table without actually sharing the data, but I may be wrong. In any case, it does not do any harm. Any insight on this? 


Due to specific characteristics of GTTs, there are some limitations regarding when they can be used:
  • If the Application Engine is run in online mode, then the GTTs cannot be shared between different programs on the same run.
  • You cannot use Restart Enabled with GTTs as the data is deleted when the session ends. In its current version, PeopleBooks state otherwise, but I think it is a typo.
  • %UpdateStats are not supported. Before Oracle Database 12c, if the statistics would be shared among all the sessions. Oracle Database 12c also supports session specific statistics, which would be the desired behavior in PeopleSoft (from a higher level point of view, programmers are expecting the temporary table to be dedicated to the instance). I guess the %UpdateStats is not supported because Oracle Database 11g is still supported by PeopleTools 8.54 and in that case running statistics would generate unexpected results. Still, the DBA can run statistics outside of the Application Engine program.
Note: As learnt from Oracle OpenWorld 2014, Oracle is evaluating supporting of Oracle Database 12c session specific statistics for GTT’s in a future releases of PeopleTools.


If you are moving to PeopleTools 8.54 and you want to improve the performance of a given Application Engine program, the GTTs may bring good value to your implementation. Please remember that you need to be using an Oracle Database.

    Wednesday, October 8, 2014

    Upgrading PeopleTools with Zero Downtime (3/3)

    In the past post, we covered the approach we followed to have both PeopleTools versions running at once. In this post we will cover the issues we faced and how we got around.

    Missing Tables

    Our approach for identifying tables was not perfect. By examining the traces and logs, we missed some tables that were directly impacted by Application Designer (we did not enable tracing while copying the PeopleTools projects as it would have taken too much time to complete, so we did not have those tables in our lists). Fortunately enough, we only had to adjust the list of tables a couple of times and we were up and running.


    For performance reasons, the customer had created Oracle Sequences instead of using the PeopleTools auto-numbering approach. In order to have the sequences in sync between both databases we followed the same approach we applied to the tables, deleting one of the sequences and creating a synonym pointing to the sequence in the other instance.


    Most of the performance in running SQL statements is impacted by how the database builds the execution plans. The execution plans are generated taking into account the database statistics. When using DB Links, the database on which the SQL sentence is executed does not have statistics information of the linked tables, so the execution plan may not be optimal. This is particularly true for mixed queries involving local and linked tables.

    During our testing, we identified a few performance issues which required to make the table physically present in both environments. This was not always possible, but for tables that are quite unlikely to change (for instance Business Unit options), it was definitely an option.

    Data Types

    Some of the data types used by PeopleTools changed from one release to the other. In our case, both timestamps and memo fields (LONG to CLOBS) had changed types. If the table is linked, only one of the data types could be used. In this sense, we were fortunate, as the data types used by the target PeopleTools release worked correctly in the previous release, so we could use the new ones.


    In earlier releases of the Oracle Database, each insert/update/delete operation done against a DB Link table would commit immediately (and implicitly). This would pose a serious integrity issue. Luckily, both the source and the target database releases supported global transactions (which means that the data is committed when the system explicitly calls the commit command).


    In the end, our attempt was successful. However, as you can see from the issues we faced, it cannot be concluded that it will work for all types of PeopleTools upgrades nor for certain customer requirements. Still, I thought it was a creative approach and that's why I decided to share it in this blog.

    Monday, October 6, 2014

    Upgrading PeopleTools with Zero Downtime (2/3)

    Continuing with my previous blog entry, the requirement from our customer was to be able to move users back and forth between the old and new PeopleTools releases until the latter was stabilised.

    This naturally required both PeopleTools versions to coexist. Now, as you know, you cannot just install the new PeopleTools release binaries and point them to the new release. Each PeopleTools release can only connect to a database for which the PSSTATUS.TOOLSREL field contains the corresponding version value. But this is not the only problem, also part of the data model and values on the tables changes from one PeopleTools version to the other.

    Therefore, we needed a database for each PeopleTools release, with its full stack of Application Server, Web Server, Process Scheduler, etc. The idea was to give users either the new or the old URL to access the environment, being able to rapidly switch from one instance to the other. Now, in order to maintain the data in sync between both instances, we needed to implement some kind of data replication between them, which should only cover the tables not impacted by the PeopleTools upgrade process.

    There are a couple of ways in which the PeopleTools tables could be identified. For instance, the PPLTLS84CUR project may probably contain all of them. Another source could be the mvprdexp.dms script. Instead of using those methods, we decided to search for the impacted tables using a regular expression search tool by looking at the logs and traces of the PeopleTools upgrade done again a copy of the Demo environment. Although it required more work, and a few test iterations until we got it right, it allowed us to keep the number of non-replicated tables to a minimum.

    When we finally got a list of tables, we let the key user know which functionalities would not be shared by both environments. As it turned out, Process Monitor, Query or Report Manager would need to be used separately. Fortunately enough, those functionalities did not pose a big issue from an user perspective, so we could move forward.

    The next step was to decide which replication method we would use. Both databases were Oracle, although on different versions (no version was supported by both PeopleTools releases) (*). For many of the tables, we needed a bidirectional replication, as users were expected to enter transactions in any of the two environments.

    There are many products and solutions that provide data replication with Oracle databases. We finally opted for a very simple one, which is not strictly replication: Oracle DB Link. We kept the application tables in the old PeopleTools instance, and then replaced the same tables in the new PeopleTools instance by synonyms pointing to the other instance using the DB Link. Once the new PeopleTools release was stabilised, we would move the physical tables to the target instance and create the DB Link on the other side.

    Once we implemented this approach, we started testing. During testing, we faced some challenges, but we will cover them in the next and final post.

    (*) This was unlucky. If we were using the same database version, we could have used a different schema for each PeopleTools release, and instead of creating a DB Link, we could have just used synonyms and avoid some of the issues brought by DB Links.

    Sunday, October 5, 2014

    Upgrading PeopleTools with Zero Downtime (1/3)

    A few months ago, BNB concluded a PeopleTools upgrade with a quite curious approach. Our customer, a leading Spanish financial institution, had PeopleSoft CRM 8.4 installation running under PeopleTools 8.42. Their CRM application was being used to provide support to their 24x7 call centres, and the only reason they had to perform the PeopleTools upgrade was to be able to update their database and WebLogic releases, as the existing ones were already out of support.

    Now, the organisation was going under a major structural change, so the customer wanted to perform the PeopleTools upgrade with a minimal disruption of their activities, as it was difficult at that time to obtain the needed sponsorship from higher managerial levels. In other words, they wanted to perform the upgrade as silently as possible. This translated in two particular requirements:
    • Ability to perform the PeopleTools change with zero downtime, in order to avoid any impact on the users.
    • Ability to gradually move users from the old PeopleTools release to the new one, practically limiting the impact of any product issue related to the upgrade. In case anything failed, they wanted to be able to move the users back to the old release.
    Having performed quite a few PeopleTools upgrades in the past, I knew that following the standard procedures would not help us in providing a satisfactory answer to the client. So, after some discussions, the customer agreed on trying a non-standard way of upgrade PeopleTools. We agreed to do a prototype, test and if everything went well, then move to Production. If it did not work out, we would need to do it in the standard way. As it finally turned out, the suggested approach worked out.

    I cannot say it would work for any other combination of PeopleTools and application versions, nor different customer usage of the application. Anyhow, I thought it may be useful to share it with you, in case any of you can enrich the approach with your feedback. In the next post I will describe the approach and in the third and final one I will describe the issues we faced during the implementation. So... keep tuned ;).

    Friday, October 3, 2014

    OOW14 Update: Oracle OpenWorld 2014 comes to an end

    Today was the last day of Oracle OpenWorld 2014 at San Francisco. Even though it started a bit later due to yesterday's Appreciation Event which hosted Aerosmith, Spacehog and Macklemore & Ryan Lewis (which I did not attend, but that's a different story), the day was packed with good sessions. I have particularly appreciated the PeopleTools Meet the Experts session, which allowed me to network with Oracle PeopleTools experts and share points of view with other partners and customers.

    From a PeopleSoft perspective, the event has produced some news, but actually nothing unexpected or that was not rumoured on the internet in the latest weeks. Here is a summary of the news that I found more interesting (*):

    • Fluid interface was the hottest topic from a PeopleSoft standpoint. As previously seen on this blog, Oracle announced the availability of the first applications in the coming days.
    • Fluid is initially intended for casual and executive users, but there is a plan to extend it to the power users. Under my point of view, not only the interface would need to improve a bit in order to achieve that, but also the development should be somehow simplified, as currently designing Fluid pages requires more effort than traditional PIA pages.
    • These are features in the roadmap for the Fluid interface: wizards for tile creation, related contents, activity guides and master/detail page template.
    • Oracle has no plans to deliver PeopleSoft 9.3. Still, this does not mean that they will stop investing on PeopleSoft (read more).
    • I was nicely surprised by the interest shown by attendants for the PeopleSoft Test Framework sessions. This tool has been around for a while, but the customer adoption has been slow. The new Continuous Delivery Model may bring some interest to this tool, as testing should become more iterative.
    • On the architecture side, the ability to use the new in-memory features of Oracle DB 12c under PeopleTools 8.54 brings unprecedented performance to PeopleSoft environments. Still, you would need to dedicate a minimum of 100 Gb of memory to the in-memory part of the database SGA, but if you have the money, it seems worth going for it.

    This has been a very interesting and intense week. Now, a few days to rest and return home, and then back to work with some new perspectives and ideas.

    (*) Keep in mind Oracle's Safe Harbor statement, which practically says that what was presented during the sessions does not express a commitment from Oracle.

    Thursday, October 2, 2014

    First Fluid applications to be delivered for PeopleSoft HCM 9.2 on October 21st

    During Oracle OpenWorld 2014 the announcement was made that the first functionalities taking advantage of the new Fluid interface capabilities provided in PeopleTools 8.54 would be made available together with the PeopleSoft HCM 9.2 Update Image 9.

    Now, according to My Oracle Support, this image is going to be released on next October 21st. Although you need to have PeopleSoft HCM 9.2 and PeopleTools 8.54 to apply these enhancements to your environments, you will still be able to download the Update Image virtual machine and play around with the first delivered Fluid applications.

    So, unless the image delivery date is delayed, we should be able to enjoy the first Fluid applications in less than two weeks.

    Note - Oct 20th 2014: Although the image was originally announced for today, Oracle has just posted a new availability date for October 27th, 2014.

    Note - Oct 22nd 2014: Although as per my previous note, the image was originally announced for October 27th, Oracle had released it yesterday.